<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>System7 &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.system7.org/category/hardware-software/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.system7.org</link>
	<description>Spread the word, information is free.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &amp; UEFI Secure Boot</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uefi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A technical solution has finally been proposed to avoid locking out Linux and other OS vendors from UEFI shipped motherboards.  A couple of months ago Microsoft made waves by announcing their Windows 8 support for UEFI.  Open source supports took &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technical solution has finally been proposed to avoid locking out Linux and other OS vendors from UEFI shipped motherboards.  A couple of months ago Microsoft made waves by <a title="MSDN protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/22/protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi.aspx" target="_blank">announcing their Windows 8 support for UEFI</a>.  Open source supports took notice that this security mechanism could prevent other operating systems from booting on UEFI compatible hardware.</p>
<p>The<a title="Making UEFI Secure Boot Work With Open Platforms" href="http://www.linuxfoundation.org/sites/main/files/lf_uefi_secure_boot_open_platforms_0.pdf" target="_blank"> Linux Foundation has released a paper with a possible solution</a>:</p>
<address>papers suggest that all platforms which enable Secure Boot should ship in &#8220;setup mode&#8221; which would give the system owner control of the Secure Boot system. Initial startup of an operating system should then detect that setup mode and install a KEK (key-exchange-key) and PK to enable Secure Boot. The system would then securely boot that operating system. When a user needed to take control of their system&#8217;s secure boot, a &#8220;reset&#8221; option for UEFI&#8217;s keys would allow those keys to be cleared and a different operating system installed. Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 8 could also be pre-installed in the same way; the UEFI reset would then unlock the machine for other operating systems.</address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>wtf</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/13/wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/13/wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_860" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-shot-2011-06-27-at-9.30.41-PM.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-860" title="VMWare Fusion Recommends Anti-Virus" src="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-shot-2011-06-27-at-9.30.41-PM-300x271.png" alt="" width="300" height="271" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">VMWare Fusion Recommends Anti-Virus</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/13/wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: Sex, Lies&#8230;&#8230;and cybercrime?</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft also recently released an eye catching paper aptly named that discusses the validity of security reports.  Far from being broadly-based estimates of losses across the population, the cyber-crime estimates that we have appear to be largely the answers of &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft  also recently released an eye catching paper aptly named that discusses  the validity of security reports.  Far from being broadly-based  estimates of losses across the population, the cyber-crime estimates  that we have appear to be largely the answers of a handful of people  extrapolated to the whole population.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/SexLiesandCybercrimeSurveys.pdf">Sex, Lies and Cybercrime Surveys</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Microsoft Security Report</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s Security Intelligent Report (SIR) v10 has been released and can be found here. The key highlights from Microsoft&#8217;s own Roger Halbheer: Industry vulnerability disclosure trends continue an overall trend of moderate declines since 2006. This trend is likely because &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Microsoft Security Intelligence Report" href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/sir/default.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s Security Intelligent Report (SIR) v10 has been released and can be found here</a>.</p>
<p>The key highlights from <a title="Roger Halbheer's SIR remarks" href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/05/13/security-intelligence-report-v10-released/" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s own Roger Halbheer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Industry vulnerability disclosure trends continue an  overall trend of moderate declines since 2006. This trend is likely  because of better development practices and quality control throughout  the industry,which result in more secure software and fewer  vulnerabilities.</li>
<li>Vulnerability disclosures for Microsoft  products increased slightly in 2010 but have generally remained stable  over the past several periods.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>The  exploitation of Java vulnerabilities sharply increased in the second  quarter of 2010 and surpassed every other exploitation category that the  MMPC tracks,including generic HTML/scripting exploits,operating system  exploits,and document exploits.</li>
<li>The number of Adobe Acrobat and  Adobe Reader exploits dropped by more than half after the first  quarter,and remained near this reduced level throughout the remainder of  the year.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>Exploits that affected Adobe  Acrobat and Adobe Reader accounted for most document format exploits  detected throughout 2010. Almost all of these exploits involved the  generic exploit family Win32/Pdfjsc</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>Microsoft  Office file format exploits accounted for between 0.5 and 2.8 percent  of the document format exploits that were detected each quarter in 2010.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>As  in previous periods,infection rates for more recently released  Microsoft operating systems and service packs are consistently lower  than older ones,for both client and server platforms. Windows 7 and  Windows Server 2008 R2,the most recently released Windows client and  server versions,respectively,have the lowest infection rates.</li>
<li>Infection  rates for the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista® and Windows 7 are lower  than for the corresponding 32-bit versions of those operating systems.  One reason may be that 64-bit versions of Windows still appeal to a more  technically savvy audience than their 32-bit counterparts,despite  increasing sales of 64-bit Windows versions among the general computing  population. Kernel Patch Protection (KPP),a feature of 64-bit versions  of Windows that protects the kernel from unauthorized modification,may  also contribute to the difference by preventing certain types of malware  from operating.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>In the first half of  2010,phishers showed signs of targeting online gaming sites with  increasing frequency,although this push appeared to have dwindled as  social networks came under increased attack. Impressions that targeted  gaming sites reached a high of 16.7 percent of all impressions in June  before dropping to a more typical 2.1 percent in December.</li>
<li>Phishing  sites that target social networks routinely receive the highest number  of impressions per active phishing site. The percentage of active  phishing sites that targeted social networks increased during the final  months of the year,but still only accounted for 4.2 percent of active  sites in December,despite receiving 84.5 percent of impressions that  month. Nevertheless,the number of active sites targeting gaming sites  remained relatively high during the second half of the year,which  suggests that more campaigns may be coming.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s DEP, ASLR: Can&#8217;t have one without the other&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting series on the Microsoft Security Research &#38; Defense blog covering ASLR and DEP memory protections found in Windows XP SP3+. DEP effectiveness (without ASLR) Summary: DEP breaks exploitation techniques that attackers have traditionally relied upon, but DEP &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting series on the <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2010/12/08/on-the-effectiveness-of-dep-and-aslr.aspx">Microsoft Security Research &amp; Defense</a> blog covering ASLR and <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2009/06/12/understanding-dep-as-a-mitigation-technology-part-1.aspx">DEP</a> memory protections found in Windows XP SP3+.</p>
<h3>DEP effectiveness (without ASLR)</h3>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: DEP breaks exploitation techniques that attackers have  traditionally relied upon, but DEP without ASLR is not robust enough to  prevent arbitrary code execution in most cases.</p>
<h3>ASLR effectiveness (without DEP)</h3>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: ASLR breaks an attacker&#8217;s assumptions about where code  and data are located in the address space of a process.  ASLR can be  bypassed if the attacker can predict, discover, or control the location  of certain memory regions (particularly DLL mappings).  The absence of  DEP can allow an attacker to use heap spraying to place code at a  predictable location in the address space.</p>
<h3>DEP+ASLR effectiveness</h3>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: DEP+ASLR are most effective when used in combination;  however, their combined effectiveness is heavily dominated by the  effectiveness of ASLR.  Exploits have been developed that are able to  bypass DEP+ASLR in the context of browsers and third-party  applications.  Nevertheless, the vast majority of exploits written to  date do not attempt to bypass the combination of DEP+ASLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>win32 memory capture &amp; analysis cheat sheet</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2010/06/14/win32-memory-capture-analysis-cheat-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2010/06/14/win32-memory-capture-analysis-cheat-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A high level overview to perform live memory captures and analysis: capture memory via moonsol&#8217;s win32dd parse memory snapshot with mandiant&#8217;s memoryze analyze results via audit viewer or analyze using the volatility framework &#8212; neatly packaged in SAN&#8217;S Sift Workstation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A high level overview to perform live memory captures and analysis:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>capture</strong> memory via <a href="http://moonsols.com/product">moonsol&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://moonsols.com/component/jdownloads/view.download/3/2">win32dd</a></li>
<li>parse memory snapshot with mandiant&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mandiant.com/products/free_software/memoryze/">memoryze</a></li>
<li><strong>analyze</strong> results via <a href="http://www.mandiant.com/products/free_software/mandiant_audit_viewer/download">audit viewer</a></li>
<li>or <strong>analyze</strong> using the <a title="Volatility Framework" href="https://www.volatilesystems.com/default/volatility" target="_blank">volatility framework</a> &#8212; neatly packaged in <a title="SIFT Workstation Image" href="https://computer-forensics2.sans.org/community/siftkit/" target="_blank">SAN&#8217;S Sift Workstation</a></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2010/06/14/win32-memory-capture-analysis-cheat-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Anti Forensics Tip of the Day&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2009/11/11/windows-anti-forensics-tip-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2009/11/11/windows-anti-forensics-tip-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I previously wrote about how to have your system automatically clear the pagefile before a reboot or shutdown.  There&#8217;s a couple other steps I recommend you make on your system&#8230; Automatically permanently delete (Nuke on Delete)- Normally Delete sends files &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2009/11/11/windows-anti-forensics-tip-of-the-day/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://www.system7.org/2009/06/10/windows-forensics-tip-of-the-day/">previously wrote </a>about how to have your system automatically clear the pagefile before a reboot or shutdown.  There&#8217;s a couple other steps I recommend you make on your system&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Automatically permanently delete (Nuke on Delete)- </strong>Normally Delete sends files to the Recycle Bin and a Shift+Delete will permanently delete them.  With the registry tweak below the normal Delete will also behave as a permanent delete. ***Note: Delete does not mean a file is deleted.  It only frees up the file record and clusters so they _could_ be overwritten.</p>
<ol>
<li>Go to Start -&gt; Run and type Regedit</li>
<li>On the left hand side select the “+” to navigate to the following.</li>
<li>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SOFTWARE \ Microsoft \ Windows \ CurrentVersion \ Explorer \ BitBucket</li>
<li>On the right look for NukeOnDelete</li>
<li>Right click it and set the key value for NukeOnDelete to 1</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Scheduled Task to Zero out unused disk space &#8211; </strong>As I mentioned above a deleted file only insures that there is a _chance_ the file will be overwritten.  If you run the below command it will zero out all unused disk space which _should_ be good enough to prevent file content recovery. ***Note: The deleted file name will still be lying around until a new file happens to overwrite it.</p>
<p>&gt;cipher /W:[directory_to_wipe]</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my scheduled task: C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe /c cipher /W:C:\</p>
<p><strong>Scheduled Task to Delete Recent Items &#8211; </strong>Even if you permanently delete a file and or use Eraser there&#8217;s a copy of the filename in your Recent directory.  I have the following scheduled task command which clears my Recent items once a day&#8230;.</p>
<p>Task for Recent Items:</p>
<p>&gt;C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe /c del &#8220;c:\documents and settings\<strong>[username]</strong>\recent\*.lnk&#8221;</p>
<p>Task for Recent Office Items:</p>
<p>&gt;C:\WINDOWS\system32\cmd.exe /c del /Q &#8220;C:\Documents and Settings\<strong>[username]</strong>\Application Data\Microsoft\Office\Recent\*.*&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/eraser ">Eraser </a>-</strong> I highly recommend using this great freeware utility.  One of many things it does is adds a new option in your content menu to permanently delete a file and zero out the contents all at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2009/11/11/windows-anti-forensics-tip-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jailbreak: Export non-exportable Windows certificates</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2009/10/13/jailbreak-export-non-exportable-windows-certificates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2009/10/13/jailbreak-export-non-exportable-windows-certificates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across a handy (&#38; free) Windows utility that allows you to export &#8220;non exportable&#8221; certificates.  Do you want to get at those recovery certificates or private keys? Jailbreak can be snatched here: https://www.isecpartners.com/jailbreak.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across a handy (&amp; free) Windows utility that allows you to export &#8220;non exportable&#8221; certificates.  Do you want to get at those recovery certificates or private keys? Jailbreak can be snatched here: <a href="https://www.isecpartners.com/jailbreak.html">https://www.isecpartners.com/jailbreak.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2009/10/13/jailbreak-export-non-exportable-windows-certificates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting up Windows Honey Pot Shares</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2009/09/12/setting-up-windows-honey-pot-shares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2009/09/12/setting-up-windows-honey-pot-shares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently setup a honeypot share on a Windows server.  I put some very &#8220;interesting&#8221; files and directories in there (financial information, PII etc) and then enabled audit logging in Windows.  There&#8217;s a very powerful but mostly unknown Windows tool &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2009/09/12/setting-up-windows-honey-pot-shares/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently setup a honeypot share on a Windows server.  I put some very &#8220;interesting&#8221; files and directories in there (financial information, PII etc) and then enabled audit logging in Windows.  There&#8217;s a very powerful but mostly unknown Windows tool called <a title="Log Parser 2.2" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=890cd06b-abf8-4c25-91b2-f8d975cf8c07&amp;displaylang=en">LogParser</a> which can be used to query your System/Security event logs.  It&#8217;s possible to write a script that will query your system security log every so often and look for requests to the honey pot.  You can get very sophisticated using LogParser, a few hand written scripts, and the <a title="How to schedule tasks in Windows XP" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308569">Windows Task Scheduler</a>.</p>
<ol>
<li><a title="How to configure file sharing in Windows XP" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304040/">Create the honeypot file share.</a></li>
<li>Create sexy files in the share: bank_statement.pdf, password_list.txt, 08taxes.pst, gmail.doc, megan13.jpg, etc&#8230;.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/els_specify_filefolder_audit.mspx?mfr=true">Enable audit logging on shared folder.</a></li>
<li>Install <a title="Log Parser 2.2" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=890cd06b-abf8-4c25-91b2-f8d975cf8c07&amp;displaylang=en">LogParser</a>.</li>
<li>Learn to use LogParser here: <a href="http://128.175.24.251/forensics/logparser.htm">http://128.175.24.251/forensics/logparser.htm</a></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2009/09/12/setting-up-windows-honey-pot-shares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s google killer: Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2009/06/11/microsofts-google-killer-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2009/06/11/microsofts-google-killer-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Microsoft&#8217;s Bing has been out for a couple weeks I&#8217;m wondering everyone&#8217;s impression.  I like the simple interface with minimal ad&#8217;s and clutter.  Nothing like the MSN search.  It looks awfully similar to Google&#8217;s interface. However, I&#8217;m very &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2009/06/11/microsofts-google-killer-bing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that <a href="http://www.bing.com">Microsoft&#8217;s Bing</a> has been out for a couple weeks I&#8217;m wondering everyone&#8217;s impression.  I like the simple interface with minimal ad&#8217;s and clutter.  Nothing like the MSN search.  It looks awfully similar to Google&#8217;s interface.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m very disappointed with search results.  I&#8217;m finding that most of my queries are not returning what I&#8217;m looking for.  I find myself returning to google.  This could be because the Bing engine doesn&#8217;t have enough information from analytics data to generate better results.  Hopefully with time this will improve; once Bing see&#8217;s what pages users are really interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2009/06/11/microsofts-google-killer-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

