<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>System7 &#187; linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.system7.org/category/hardware-software/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.system7.org</link>
	<description>Spread the word, information is free.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &amp; UEFI Secure Boot</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uefi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A technical solution has finally been proposed to avoid locking out Linux and other OS vendors from UEFI shipped motherboards.  A couple of months ago Microsoft made waves by announcing their Windows 8 support for UEFI.  Open source supports took &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technical solution has finally been proposed to avoid locking out Linux and other OS vendors from UEFI shipped motherboards.  A couple of months ago Microsoft made waves by <a title="MSDN protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/22/protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi.aspx" target="_blank">announcing their Windows 8 support for UEFI</a>.  Open source supports took notice that this security mechanism could prevent other operating systems from booting on UEFI compatible hardware.</p>
<p>The<a title="Making UEFI Secure Boot Work With Open Platforms" href="http://www.linuxfoundation.org/sites/main/files/lf_uefi_secure_boot_open_platforms_0.pdf" target="_blank"> Linux Foundation has released a paper with a possible solution</a>:</p>
<address>papers suggest that all platforms which enable Secure Boot should ship in &#8220;setup mode&#8221; which would give the system owner control of the Secure Boot system. Initial startup of an operating system should then detect that setup mode and install a KEK (key-exchange-key) and PK to enable Secure Boot. The system would then securely boot that operating system. When a user needed to take control of their system&#8217;s secure boot, a &#8220;reset&#8221; option for UEFI&#8217;s keys would allow those keys to be cleared and a different operating system installed. Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 8 could also be pre-installed in the same way; the UEFI reset would then unlock the machine for other operating systems.</address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reduce ssh brute force attempts&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2009/07/26/reduce-ssh-brute-force-attempts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2009/07/26/reduce-ssh-brute-force-attempts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you&#8217;re still running sshd on port 22 (which you should change!) you&#8217;re probably getting hammered with brute force attempts.  Take a peak at /var/log/secure or /var/log/wtmp or the &#8220;last&#8221; command and have a looksy. There&#8217;s a great little application &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2009/07/26/reduce-ssh-brute-force-attempts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you&#8217;re still running sshd on port 22 (which you should change!) you&#8217;re probably getting hammered with brute force attempts.  Take a peak at /var/log/secure or /var/log/wtmp or the &#8220;last&#8221; command and have a looksy.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a great little application called &#8220;denyhosts&#8221; which will automatically add suspected brute forcers to your DENY list.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>URL        : <a href="http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/">http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
License    : GPLv2<br />
Description: DenyHosts is a Python script that analyzes the sshd server log<br />
           : messages to determine which hosts are attempting to hack into your<br />
           : system. It also determines what user accounts are being targeted.<br />
           : It keeps track of the frequency of attempts from each host and,<br />
           : upon discovering a repeated attack host, updates the<br />
           : /etc/hosts.deny file to prevent future break-in attempts from that<br />
           : host.  Email reports can be sent to a system admin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2009/07/26/reduce-ssh-brute-force-attempts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cracking Windows SAM file</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2009/01/30/cracking-windows-sam-file/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2009/01/30/cracking-windows-sam-file/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend of mine showed me a great online video shows cracking the Window&#8217;s SAM file using the BackTrack live CD. The Windows SAM file which is a database stored as a registry file stores users&#8217; passwords in a hashed &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2009/01/30/cracking-windows-sam-file/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine showed me a great online video shows cracking the Window&#8217;s SAM file using the BackTrack live CD.</p>
<p>The Windows SAM file which is a database stored as a registry file stores users&#8217; passwords in a hashed format.</p>
<p>The video can be found <a href="http://irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/backtrackplaintext">here</a> and the BackTrack live CD can be downloaded <a href="http://www.remote-exploit.org/index.php">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2009/01/30/cracking-windows-sam-file/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

