<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>System7 &#187; hardware &amp; software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.system7.org/category/hardware-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.system7.org</link>
	<description>Spread the word, information is free.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &amp; UEFI Secure Boot</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uefi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A technical solution has finally been proposed to avoid locking out Linux and other OS vendors from UEFI shipped motherboards.  A couple of months ago Microsoft made waves by announcing their Windows 8 support for UEFI.  Open source supports took &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technical solution has finally been proposed to avoid locking out Linux and other OS vendors from UEFI shipped motherboards.  A couple of months ago Microsoft made waves by <a title="MSDN protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/22/protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi.aspx" target="_blank">announcing their Windows 8 support for UEFI</a>.  Open source supports took notice that this security mechanism could prevent other operating systems from booting on UEFI compatible hardware.</p>
<p>The<a title="Making UEFI Secure Boot Work With Open Platforms" href="http://www.linuxfoundation.org/sites/main/files/lf_uefi_secure_boot_open_platforms_0.pdf" target="_blank"> Linux Foundation has released a paper with a possible solution</a>:</p>
<address>papers suggest that all platforms which enable Secure Boot should ship in &#8220;setup mode&#8221; which would give the system owner control of the Secure Boot system. Initial startup of an operating system should then detect that setup mode and install a KEK (key-exchange-key) and PK to enable Secure Boot. The system would then securely boot that operating system. When a user needed to take control of their system&#8217;s secure boot, a &#8220;reset&#8221; option for UEFI&#8217;s keys would allow those keys to be cleared and a different operating system installed. Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 8 could also be pre-installed in the same way; the UEFI reset would then unlock the machine for other operating systems.</address>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/10/31/microsoft-uefi-secure-boot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When more security results in less security&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/09/30/when-more-security-results-in-less-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/09/30/when-more-security-results-in-less-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crypto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elcomsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an article that famed cryptographers at Elcomsoft have discovered a method to brute force RIM Blackberry device passwords.  Usually a Blackberry will only allow 10 failed password attempts before wiping the device.  Elcomsoft discovered if a user enables media &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/09/30/when-more-security-results-in-less-security/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article that famed cryptographers at Elcomsoft have discovered a method to <a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/rim-2010630.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-878" title="Rim Blackberry Logo" src="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/rim-2010630-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="128" /></a>brute force RIM Blackberry device passwords.  Usually a Blackberry will only allow 10 failed password attempts before wiping the device.  Elcomsoft discovered if a user enables media card encryption an unlimited offline password attack against the media card can be performed bypassing the 10 guess restriction.</p>
<p>Scary stuff&#8230;  I&#8217;m a user with Media Card Encryption enabled.  Do I disable encryption OR permanently solder the media card in place so it can&#8217;t be removed?</p>
<p>From Computer World:</p>
<p>&#8220;A Russian security company upgraded a phone-password cracking suite with the ability to figure out the master device password for Research in Motion&#8217;s BlackBerry devices. Elcomsoft said September 29 that before it developed the product, it was believed there was no way to figure out a device password on a BlackBerry smartphone or PlayBook tablet. BlackBerry smartphones are configured to wipe all data on the phone if a password is typed incorrectly 10 times in a row, the company said. Elcomsoft said it figured a way around the problem using a BlackBerry&#8217;s removable media card, but only if a user has configured their smartphone in a certain way. For the software to be successful, a user must have enabled the feature to encrypt data on the media card. The feature is disabled by default, but Elcomsoft said about 30 percent of BlackBerry users have it enabled for extra security. The company&#8217;s software can then analyze the encrypted media card and use a brute-force method to figure out a password. Elcomsoft said it can recover a seven-character password in less than an hour if the password is all lower-case or all capital letters. The software does not need access to the actual BlackBerry device but just the encrypted media card. The new feature is wrapped into Elcomsoft&#8217;s Phone Password Breaker. The software can also recover plain-text passwords used to access encrypted backup files for Apple&#8217;s iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch devices. To crack those passwords, a user does need to have the Apple device in hand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read the <a title="Russian firm unveils tool to crack BlackBerry passwords" href="https://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9220390/Russian_firm_unveils_tool_to_crack_BlackBerry_passwords" target="_blank">full article here at Computer World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/09/30/when-more-security-results-in-less-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steps to improve cable modem performance</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/14/steps-to-improve-cable-modem-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/14/steps-to-improve-cable-modem-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benchmark current signal &#8212; access common cable modems via http://192.168.100.1 Target these power levels: Downstream  in the range -15 dBmV to +15 dBmV Upstream transmit within the range +8 to +58 dBmV Remove unnecessary power distractions i.e.:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Benchmark current signal &#8212; access common cable modems via http://192.168.100.1</li>
<li>Target these power level<a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/cmodem_interface.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-865" title="Cable Modem Interface" src="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/cmodem_interface-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>s:</li>
<ol>
<li>Downstream  in the range <strong>-15 dBmV</strong> to <strong>+15 dBmV</strong></li>
<li><strong></strong>Upstream transmit within the range <strong>+8</strong> to <strong>+58 dBmV</strong></li>
</ol>
<li><strong></strong>Remove unnecessary power distractions i.e.:
<p><div id="attachment_866" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/splitter.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-866" title="Coaxial Splitter" src="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/splitter-e1313254660776-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Coaxial Splitter</p></div></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/14/steps-to-improve-cable-modem-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>wtf</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/13/wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/13/wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_860" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-shot-2011-06-27-at-9.30.41-PM.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-860" title="VMWare Fusion Recommends Anti-Virus" src="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Screen-shot-2011-06-27-at-9.30.41-PM-300x271.png" alt="" width="300" height="271" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">VMWare Fusion Recommends Anti-Virus</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/13/wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Web Application Scanner Benchmark</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/08/commercial-web-application-scanner-benchmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/08/commercial-web-application-scanner-benchmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hardware & software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a great post doing a feature comparison of commercial &#38; open source scanners over at the Security Tools Benchmarking blog. It appears as though IBM Rational&#8217;s AppScan and W3AF are the winners in the commercial and free/open source categories, &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/08/08/commercial-web-application-scanner-benchmark/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a great post doing a feature comparison of commercial &amp; open source scanners over at the <a title="A blog dedicated to aiding pen-testers in choosing tools that make a difference." href="http://sectooladdict.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Security Tools Benchmarking blog</a>.</p>
<p>It appears as though IBM Rational&#8217;s AppScan and W3AF are the winners in the commercial and free/open source categories, respectively.  Read the full analysis <a title="The Scanning Legion: Web Application Scanners Accuracy Assessment &amp; Feature Comparison Commercial &amp; Open Source Scanners" href="http://sectooladdict.blogspot.com/2011/08/commercial-web-application-scanner.html" target="_blank">here</a>.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/08/08/commercial-web-application-scanner-benchmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: Sex, Lies&#8230;&#8230;and cybercrime?</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft also recently released an eye catching paper aptly named that discusses the validity of security reports.  Far from being broadly-based estimates of losses across the population, the cyber-crime estimates that we have appear to be largely the answers of &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft  also recently released an eye catching paper aptly named that discusses  the validity of security reports.  Far from being broadly-based  estimates of losses across the population, the cyber-crime estimates  that we have appear to be largely the answers of a handful of people  extrapolated to the whole population.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.system7.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/SexLiesandCybercrimeSurveys.pdf">Sex, Lies and Cybercrime Surveys</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/26/microsoft-sex-lies-and-cybercrime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Microsoft Security Report</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s Security Intelligent Report (SIR) v10 has been released and can be found here. The key highlights from Microsoft&#8217;s own Roger Halbheer: Industry vulnerability disclosure trends continue an overall trend of moderate declines since 2006. This trend is likely because &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Microsoft Security Intelligence Report" href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/sir/default.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s Security Intelligent Report (SIR) v10 has been released and can be found here</a>.</p>
<p>The key highlights from <a title="Roger Halbheer's SIR remarks" href="http://www.halbheer.ch/security/2011/05/13/security-intelligence-report-v10-released/" target="_blank">Microsoft&#8217;s own Roger Halbheer</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Industry vulnerability disclosure trends continue an  overall trend of moderate declines since 2006. This trend is likely  because of better development practices and quality control throughout  the industry,which result in more secure software and fewer  vulnerabilities.</li>
<li>Vulnerability disclosures for Microsoft  products increased slightly in 2010 but have generally remained stable  over the past several periods.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>The  exploitation of Java vulnerabilities sharply increased in the second  quarter of 2010 and surpassed every other exploitation category that the  MMPC tracks,including generic HTML/scripting exploits,operating system  exploits,and document exploits.</li>
<li>The number of Adobe Acrobat and  Adobe Reader exploits dropped by more than half after the first  quarter,and remained near this reduced level throughout the remainder of  the year.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>Exploits that affected Adobe  Acrobat and Adobe Reader accounted for most document format exploits  detected throughout 2010. Almost all of these exploits involved the  generic exploit family Win32/Pdfjsc</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>Microsoft  Office file format exploits accounted for between 0.5 and 2.8 percent  of the document format exploits that were detected each quarter in 2010.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>As  in previous periods,infection rates for more recently released  Microsoft operating systems and service packs are consistently lower  than older ones,for both client and server platforms. Windows 7 and  Windows Server 2008 R2,the most recently released Windows client and  server versions,respectively,have the lowest infection rates.</li>
<li>Infection  rates for the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista® and Windows 7 are lower  than for the corresponding 32-bit versions of those operating systems.  One reason may be that 64-bit versions of Windows still appeal to a more  technically savvy audience than their 32-bit counterparts,despite  increasing sales of 64-bit Windows versions among the general computing  population. Kernel Patch Protection (KPP),a feature of 64-bit versions  of Windows that protects the kernel from unauthorized modification,may  also contribute to the difference by preventing certain types of malware  from operating.</li>
</ul>
<p>[…]</p>
<ul>
<li>In the first half of  2010,phishers showed signs of targeting online gaming sites with  increasing frequency,although this push appeared to have dwindled as  social networks came under increased attack. Impressions that targeted  gaming sites reached a high of 16.7 percent of all impressions in June  before dropping to a more typical 2.1 percent in December.</li>
<li>Phishing  sites that target social networks routinely receive the highest number  of impressions per active phishing site. The percentage of active  phishing sites that targeted social networks increased during the final  months of the year,but still only accounted for 4.2 percent of active  sites in December,despite receiving 84.5 percent of impressions that  month. Nevertheless,the number of active sites targeting gaming sites  remained relatively high during the second half of the year,which  suggests that more campaigns may be coming.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/25/latest-microsoft-security-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>pandaflux&#8217;s list o&#8217; recommended browser plugins</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/16/pandafluxs-list-o-recommended-browser-plugins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/16/pandafluxs-list-o-recommended-browser-plugins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox googlesharing: encrypts your google traffic and routes it through a proxy where it is combined with many other people. https-everywhere: Automatically enables a secure connection for websites that supports it. better privacy: Among other things, Better Privacy will delete “flash &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2011/06/16/pandafluxs-list-o-recommended-browser-plugins/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"></p>
<h3>Firefox</h3>
<ul>
<li> <strong><a href="https://help.riseup.net/en/googlesharing" target="_blank">googlesharing</a>:</strong> encrypts your google traffic and routes it through a proxy where it is combined with many other people.</li>
<li> <strong><a href="https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere" target="_blank">https-everywhere</a>:</strong> Automatically enables a <a href="https://help.riseup.net/en/secure-connection" target="_blank">secure connection</a> for websites that supports it.</li>
<li> <strong><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/betterprivacy/" target="_blank">better privacy</a>:</strong> Among other things, Better Privacy will delete “flash cookies” that are difficult to manage otherwise.</li>
</ul>
<h3><a name="1309486fb3ae1b49_chrome"></a>Chrome<a href="https://help.riseup.net/en/better-web-browsing#chrome" target="_blank">¶</a></h3>
<ul>
<li> <strong><a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/jeoacafpbcihiomhlakheieifhpjdfeo" target="_blank">disconnect</a>:</strong> Stop third parties and search engines from tracking the webpages you go to and searches you do.</li>
<li> <strong><a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ghgabhipcejejjmhhchfonmamedcbeod" target="_blank">click &amp; clean</a>:</strong> Deletes your browsing history, typed URLs, Flash cookies, all traces of your online activity to protect your privacy.</li>
<li> <strong><a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/flcpelgcagfhfoegekianiofphddckof" target="_blank">KB SSL Enforcer</a>:</strong> Automatic security, browse encrypted.</li>
<li> <strong><a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dkpkjedlegmelkogpgamcaemgbanohip" target="_blank">NOREF</a>:</strong> Suppress Referrer (referer) for Hyperlinks</li>
</ul>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2011/06/16/pandafluxs-list-o-recommended-browser-plugins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s DEP, ASLR: Can&#8217;t have one without the other&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting series on the Microsoft Security Research &#38; Defense blog covering ASLR and DEP memory protections found in Windows XP SP3+. DEP effectiveness (without ASLR) Summary: DEP breaks exploitation techniques that attackers have traditionally relied upon, but DEP &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting series on the <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2010/12/08/on-the-effectiveness-of-dep-and-aslr.aspx">Microsoft Security Research &amp; Defense</a> blog covering ASLR and <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2009/06/12/understanding-dep-as-a-mitigation-technology-part-1.aspx">DEP</a> memory protections found in Windows XP SP3+.</p>
<h3>DEP effectiveness (without ASLR)</h3>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: DEP breaks exploitation techniques that attackers have  traditionally relied upon, but DEP without ASLR is not robust enough to  prevent arbitrary code execution in most cases.</p>
<h3>ASLR effectiveness (without DEP)</h3>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: ASLR breaks an attacker&#8217;s assumptions about where code  and data are located in the address space of a process.  ASLR can be  bypassed if the attacker can predict, discover, or control the location  of certain memory regions (particularly DLL mappings).  The absence of  DEP can allow an attacker to use heap spraying to place code at a  predictable location in the address space.</p>
<h3>DEP+ASLR effectiveness</h3>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>: DEP+ASLR are most effective when used in combination;  however, their combined effectiveness is heavily dominated by the  effectiveness of ASLR.  Exploits have been developed that are able to  bypass DEP+ASLR in the context of browsers and third-party  applications.  Nevertheless, the vast majority of exploits written to  date do not attempt to bypass the combination of DEP+ASLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2010/12/16/microsofts-dep-aslr-cant-have-one-without-the-other/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoogleSharing: a firefox addon</title>
		<link>http://www.system7.org/2010/11/08/googlesharing-a-firefox-addon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.system7.org/2010/11/08/googlesharing-a-firefox-addon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.system7.org/?p=671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While reading the latest issue of Information Security Magazine I came across an article of a tool Moxie Marlinspike released at Blackhat this past summer, Googlesharing.  Marlinspike has introduced several tools that help people concerned about privacy avoid giving up &#8230; <a href="http://www.system7.org/2010/11/08/googlesharing-a-firefox-addon/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While reading the latest issue of <a title="Information Security Magazine" href="http://infosecmag.com" target="_blank">Information Security Magazine </a>I came across an article of a tool <a title="About Moxie marlinspike" href="http://www.system7.org/?s=marlin" target="_blank">Moxie Marlinspike </a>released at Blackhat this past summer, <a title="Googlesharing" href="http://www.googlesharing.net/" target="_blank">Googlesharing</a>. </p>
<p>Marlinspike has introduced several tools<br />
that help people concerned about privacy avoid giving up personal information.<br />
GoogleSharing, a Firefox add-on, acts as an anonymizing proxy service and is<br />
designed to evade Google analytics and prevent Google from tracking searches. </p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 202px"><img title="Googlesharing" src="http://www.googlesharing.net/images/diagram2.png" alt="GoogleSharing firefox plugin" width="192" height="268" /><p class="wp-caption-text">GoogleSharing firefox plugin</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.system7.org/2010/11/08/googlesharing-a-firefox-addon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

